
Section 5 Formulation of Alternative Plans
EAA Storage Reservoirs Revised Draft PIR and EIS February 2006
5-7
water southward to the WCAs to meet regulation schedules when the
WCAs already have too much water.
3. Reduce regulatory releases of water from Lake Okeechobee to the St.
Lucie and Caloosahatchee Estuaries. Storage in both the C-44 and C-43
basins to the east and west of the lake can hold water back and not send it
to the lake or the estuaries. This would reduce the need to release lake
water to meet regulation schedules to the east and west estuaries in such
large volumes that their natural salinity regimes are harmed.
4. Meet agricultural demands within the EAA. More water could be moved
from east and west of the lake to the lake and then southward to the EAA
to meet the needs of agriculture.
5. Increase flood protection within the EAA. Flood runoff could be
backpumped from the EAA through the lake to storage east and west of
the lake to reduce flood damages.
To capture excess agricultural runoff from the EAA, like the north of Lake
Okeechobee location, the water would be pumped north through Lake
Okeechobee and again pumped east or west into storage reservoirs. This would
require new, massive pumping systems and treatment systems for the water.
Treatment is required before water is allowed to enter Lake Okeechobee and
again prior to discharging back to the lake to meet current state water quality
standards.
Water stored in expanded reservoirs east and west of Lake Okeechobee must
ultimately be released either back to the lake to increase the quantity of water
delivered to the Everglades or to one or both estuaries. While peak regulatory
releases to the estuaries may be further moderated with additional storage east
and west of Lake Okeechobee, it seems likely that this concept could result in
more freshwater sent to the estuaries than is being planned for in the C-43
Basin Storage Reservoir and IRL-South projects and less efficient delivery of
additional water to the WCAs. Thus, this location most likely would not achieve
the entire ecosystem benefits in the Caloosahatchee and Indian River Estuaries
that would be achieved by locating the EAA Storage Reservoirs project
elsewhere.
Expanding the size of the reservoirs for this option will also take additional
property off the tax roles in largely rural counties. This would be expected to
have negative impacts on the socioeconomic components of the environment in
these counties.
5.2.1.4 Aquifer Storage and Recovery Systems (ASR)
The Comprehensive Plan already includes the Lake Okeechobee ASR
Compartment (Compartment GG) as well as the C-43 Basin ASR Compartment
Kommentare zu diesen Handbüchern