
Section 5 Formulation of Alternative Plans
EAA Storage Reservoirs Revised Draft PIR and EIS February 2006
5-61
Seepage control is not required along the common Phase 1, Cell1 and STA
embankment section. Some measure of seepage control will be developed for
Holey Land for both systems. The Earthen Embankment cutoff has an
advantage with less quantities and depths.
Cost Variability issues include risk and uncertainty as are addressed within this
paper, but also consider a deviation in estimated probable cost by the COE and
SFWMD methods and quantities for both Earthen Embankment and RCC.
O&M Delta considers only additional slope areas to be maintained with Earthen
Embankment for erosion repair and mowing. Applying $1,500/Acre/Year, the 6-,
10-, 12- and 14-Foot has $8.9, $7.9, $7.7, and $7.8 million, respectively (present
worth).
Assuming a continued funding stream, both methods are considered nearly
equal. However, should the contract be terminated for convenience, the RCC
plant demobilization is considered an additional cost/risk. The additional
schedule for the acquisition of real estate for Alternative 2 is considered
elsewhere in the table.
Other construction process effects are measured under broader and related
categories. These other categories include: Environmental Quality – Air
Quality; Social Economic - 8A involvement; Regional Economic Development -
Employment (during construction) and Tax Revenues.
First, in terms of air quality, both systems have airborne particulates; however,
measures will be taken to minimize dust from excavation and embankment fill
and compaction operations by maintaining moisture levels in soils and along
haul routes. Also management from airborne particulates from batch plant
operations will be required. A slight advantage is given to the earth placement
process. Aesthetics is addressed under Environmental Quality and is not
addressed from Construction perspective.
Addressing Social Economic and Regional Economic Development, the 8A
contract provision will be met by both systems, and employment during
construction and tax revenues is also addressed within their respective category.
Additional information can be found in the Engineering Appendix (Appendix A).
5.4.5.9 Other Principals and Guidelines Criteria
Other Principal and Guidelines Criteria identified by Corps planning guidance
include Efficiency, Acceptability, Effectiveness and Completeness. Efficiency is
based on the cost per habitat unit of each alternative. Acceptability is the
likelihood that there will be acceptance of the project among all stakeholder
Kommentare zu diesen Handbüchern