
Section 7 Environmental Effects of the Selected Plan
EAA Storage Reservoirs Revised Draft PIR and EIS February 2006
7-10
concurrent with this project include the Everglades Construction Project, in
particular, the proposed expansion of STAs 2 and 5. These projects, like the
Selected Plan, will have various pump stations and other structures that may
pose a risk to the manatee.
In order to protect the manatee and reduce the risk of adverse impact, the Corps
will implement the following conservation measures:
The USFWS’s Standard protection measures for the Florida Manatee will be
used during all construction-related activities where appropriate, including
observer protocols upstream and downstream of turbid conditions to ensure
manatees are not in the vicinity during construction.
The Manatee Blasting Protocol will be used when explosives are required,
including having ground and boat observers, and turbidity curtains or other
temporary barrier to keep manatees out of the danger zone of the canal.
Intake canals and structures for the proposed project would include an
aluminum grate extending from the bottom of the structure to approximately
one foot above high water, with 8- inch bar spacing. The grates can be designed
for temporary removal in the event of a water emergency. The Interagency
Manatee Task Force has recommended that barriers be placed at the Lake
Okeechobee structures (S-351, 352, and 354) to prevent manatees from entering
the EAA. If barriers are in place prior to construction of the EAA Project,
adverse effects to manatees in the EAA will be minimized, and observer
protocols and barriers at individual structures of the EAA Project will be
unnecessary. The manatee barriers would be in place prior to any operational
testing of pumps associated with the proposed project.
With these conservation measures in place, the USACE determines that the
Selected Plan “may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect” the manatee.
7.9.3 Wood Stork
Wood storks typically forage in a variety of wetlands throughout the state, often
far from known rookeries. However, during breeding season, productive
wetlands providing good forage near rookeries are important to reproductive
success. Seasonally flooded agricultural fields are also wood stork foraging
habitat (Pearlstine et al. 2004). Loss of foraging habitat will occur in the project
footprint as a result of reservoir construction, both from elimination of at least
206 acres of functional wetlands and the loss of seasonally flooded agricultural
fields. As embankments will be steep and covered with riprap/rock along the
interior face of the reservoir, the embankments will likely provide limited
resting/foraging areas for wood storks. Of greater importance to wood storks is
Kommentare zu diesen Handbüchern