
Section 5 Formulation of Alternative Plans
EAA Storage Reservoirs Revised Draft PIR and EIS February 2006
5-12
within the EAA, south of Lake Okeechobee. Five parcels were identified as
possible locations shown in Figure 1-3. Two adjacent parcels totaling 31,494
acres were identified as Compartment A. Two other adjacent parcels totaling
9,302 acres became Compartment B. The last parcel of 8,884 acres was
identified as Compartment C.
5.3 ALTERNATIVE PLANS
The formulation and evaluation of alternative plans were consistent with the
Draft Program-Wide Guidance Memorandums #1 and #2 regarding the
development of design alternatives to optimize project features, cost-
effectiveness, and satisfaction of the requirements of the CERP Programmatic
Regulations. Different storage configurations, various storage depths, a range of
footprints, and several construction techniques were developed and evaluated.
Additionally, on-site management measures were developed and evaluated to
provide additional ecological benefits.
5.3.1 Evaluation Tools
The modeling tools used in the development, optimization, and evaluation of the
alternatives consisted principally of a regional-scale hydrologic simulation model
(the South Florida Water Management Model) and other modeling tools. These
are described in an earlier section (4.2.1).
5.3.2 Alternative Plans Descriptions
A total number of six alternative plans were considered as part of the plan
optimization process. Alternative 1 is the "No Action" plan, and the remaining 5
plans all have a storage capacity of 360,000 acre-feet. The maximum normal
pool depths for the alternatives are 6 feet, 10 feet, 12 feet, and 14 feet. The
alternatives are similar with the exception of reservoir footprint, embankment
height, and embankment construction method. Four alternatives are designed
with earthen fill embankments and 1 alternative was designed using roller
compacted concrete (RCC) embankment construction. RCC construction was
evaluated as a possible cost-saving construction method during a value
engineering exercise after the initial construction and cost estimates of the
earthen embankment plans. The RCC design and planning cost estimate was
developed for the 12-foot storage depth alternative, as this depth and
configuration was indicated as the most cost-effective plan.
All of the “action” alternatives include inflow pump stations (using existing and
new pump stations), gated discharge spillways to North New River and Miami
Canals and STA-3/4, an internal embankment and internal gated spillway(s) for
cell stage equalization, and seepage control canals with associated structures.
Table 5-2 provides a summary of reservoir alternatives.
Kommentare zu diesen Handbüchern